Should I keep my .raw files after I get a good image?

All questions regarding the dumping of media go here.
Post Reply
Alex
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed May 26, 2021 11:44 pm

Should I keep my .raw files after I get a good image?

Post by Alex »

When I image a floppy I always do a stream preservation first and then output to the correct format. I know .raw files contains "hidden" information maybe hidden for copy protection but if the game/software does not use protection, what's the point in keeping the raw files? What do you do for your collection?
User avatar
mr.vince
Posts: 2208
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 5:48 pm

Re: Should I keep my .raw files after I get a good image?

Post by mr.vince »

We keep them. Always. It's what's on the disk, not just some rendition of it.
SomeGuy
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:18 pm

Re: Should I keep my .raw files after I get a good image?

Post by SomeGuy »

Preservation stream/.raw dumps can be used to help prove the "authenticity" of the data on the disk. For example, on MFM disks the kryoflux software can show if a sector was written to by a user after a disk was professionally mastered at a factory.

If a disk was professionally mastered, then preservation streams can also contain hidden "mastering" data that may include info like the time it was written, the serial number of the unit that wrote it, the location and company that did it, revision number of the software image, and so on.

But more importantly, it can be used to recover data. I can't even begin to count the number of times that I have downloaded an .IMG file, discovered a damaged sector, and wished I had a preservation stream dump to analyze, as there is often a high likelihood that I could have pulled out the correct data in various ways.

Of course, if it just some data disk, and you are satisfied that you have the results you want (for example a disk image containing a zip file that tests OK) then do whatever you want.
Alex
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed May 26, 2021 11:44 pm

Re: Should I keep my .raw files after I get a good image?

Post by Alex »

Thanks for the insight. I was wondering if the GUI is giving visual input when something interesting is on the disk (like a copy protection). I think a yellow N on the 6/12th (depending of 40/80 tracks drive) track of a Sierra disk means some kind of copy protection.
SomeGuy
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2015 8:18 pm

Re: Should I keep my .raw files after I get a good image?

Post by SomeGuy »

There are many, many different kinds of copy protections. Many of those protections went to great lengths to keep people from finding the protected bits.

Warnings about different numbers of sectors, different sized sectors, or anything that deviates from standards, may be a hint as to copy protection.

But without program analysis and testing, it is only a hint. Some copy protected disks look like 100% standard disks to the Kryoflux software. In some other cases, odd geometry may actually be normal for a disk.
User avatar
mr.vince
Posts: 2208
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2010 5:48 pm

Re: Should I keep my .raw files after I get a good image?

Post by mr.vince »

Especially if you don't know for sure... keep the raw streams. Hence our recommendation.
Post Reply