Should -i3a and -i4a imply -v288?

Have an idea how to make KryoFlux even better? Let us know...
Post Reply
Posts: 120
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:36 am

Should -i3a and -i4a imply -v288?

Post by TeaRex »

Just another of my typical useless ideas.. shouldn't -i3a and -i4a imply -v288 as well? I mean they seem to work well enough without that, but maybe would they work better / be more forgiving of marginal disks if it was included? Real Atari 8-bit drives do spin at 288 RPM after all (either that or they use a correspondingly higher data rate).

User avatar
Posts: 3079
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:42 pm

Re: Should -i3a and -i4a imply -v288?

Post by IFW »

That's correct and I was thinking about that.
My problem is that some of the duplicated disks actually (and incorrectly...) use 4us/300 RPM recording...
Any more feedback on what make the default RPM for those is welcome!

Post Reply