Search found 6 matches

by Sugarbox
Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:39 pm
Forum: Software Development
Topic: CAPS library v5.1 - bug suspected
Replies: 11
Views: 4372

Re: CAPS library v5.1 - bug suspected

I think it is because of my paradigm : As I already coded the whole FDC, the only data I want to get from these files are the bitstreams.
by Sugarbox
Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:30 pm
Forum: Software Development
Topic: CAPS library v5.1 - bug suspected
Replies: 11
Views: 4372

Re: CAPS library v5.1 - bug suspected

Thanks a lot !

If I set the revolution befor the lockTrack function, I can even read weak sectors.
Untill better, it will be enough.
by Sugarbox
Tue Jul 22, 2014 3:41 pm
Forum: Software Development
Topic: CAPS library v5.1 - bug suspected
Replies: 11
Views: 4372

Re: CAPS library v5.1 - bug suspected

Hello,

Did you find anything on it ?

Regards,

Thomas
by Sugarbox
Fri Jul 04, 2014 9:10 am
Forum: Software Development
Topic: CAPS library v5.1 - bug suspected
Replies: 11
Views: 4372

Re: CAPS library v5.1 - bug suspected

Well.... allrev = 1 (allrev is used as a boolean) because of int allrev = (pti->trackcnt == pti->rawtrackcnt); rawtrackcnt = 5 because of : int maxrev = min(CAPS_MTRS, wh->trkcnt); pti->rawtrackcnt = maxrev; AND wh->trkcnt = 5. pti->trackcnt is computed as : // generate 1 revolution of data as defau...
by Sugarbox
Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:31 pm
Forum: Software Development
Topic: CAPS library v5.1 - bug suspected
Replies: 11
Views: 4372

CAPS library v5.1 - bug suspected

Hello, As I explained previously in the wrong forum, I suspected a bug on the library. Here it is (people who don't stand technical information, please don't read what is following !) On the source file CapsImage.cpp of the CapsImage folder, line 404, I read : PUBYTE trackbuf = pti->trackdata[rev]; ...
by Sugarbox
Thu Jul 03, 2014 1:29 pm
Forum: News
Topic: IPF DECODER LIBRARY sourcecode released
Replies: 25
Views: 22932

Re: IPF DECODER LIBRARY sourcecode released

Hello, As a new user of your CAPS library (which I used for my Amstrad CPC emulator, which is called "Sugarbox"), I encounter something I can consider as a bug. With the source code, I was able to correct it, but... 1/ As far as it's not my code, I would like to have a true advice about this correct...